|
|
| Author | Message |
|---|
its the nads
Join date: 2010-04-07 Trade: Posts: 21
 | Subject: guess my fav brand Wed Apr 07, 2010 2:22 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
Sonicman

Join date: 2009-09-04 Trade: Posts: 658
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:26 pm | |
| |
|
 | |
Ozexpat

Join date: 2010-04-02 Trade: Posts: 646 Location: Oxfordshire Age: 52
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:22 pm | |
| Errrrr, Krell !!!  |
|
 | |
Joker

Join date: 2009-09-07 Trade: Posts: 1339
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:41 pm | |
|  Am I warm? |
|
 | |
its the nads
Join date: 2010-04-07 Trade: Posts: 21
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Sat Apr 10, 2010 10:09 am | |
| Cold, very cold  |
|
 | |
its the nads
Join date: 2010-04-07 Trade: Posts: 21
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:07 pm | |
| Hey, who gave me a negative? |
|
 | |
JSBach

Join date: 2009-10-10 Trade: Posts: 1044 Location: Australia
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:15 pm | |
| I didn't realize you could give posters a negative.....very tempting. It's a wonder I'm not at minus 250 by now. When it comes to that ? brand there's recently been a claim made here on another thread that all amplifiers made by them have a 'house sound'. I disagree. Last night I heard an ancient 3020 integrated compared with a their 1320 preamp running into a 216 'THX' power amp. Chalk and cheese. The integrated gave a smoothing effect to nasty recordings, truncated image depth and ambience but overall was musical. The preamp/ power amp combination was far more 'electronic' sounding with greater depth and transient attack, bass control and tunefulness but, & to my ears, less musicality. Swings and slides really. |
|
 | |
Ozexpat

Join date: 2010-04-02 Trade: Posts: 646 Location: Oxfordshire Age: 52
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:59 pm | |
| Fair point JSB ! Maybe I should have added the disclaimer 'Of the intergrated NAD Amps I have owned.......' It only goes to show the subjective nature of posts based on each other disparate experience. Having said that if you are determined to compare the extremes of their range........  |
|
 | |
Timbo

Join date: 2009-09-04 Trade: Posts: 429
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Sun Apr 11, 2010 6:05 pm | |
| A house sound would come down to the designer, if that designer changes over the years the sound character will probably change as the designer is different. |
|
 | |
JSBach

Join date: 2009-10-10 Trade: Posts: 1044 Location: Australia
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:13 am | |
| | its the nads wrote: | | can you tell. |
Sure can:-  |
|
 | |
The Boss

Join date: 2009-09-09 Trade: Posts: 380
 | |
 | |
JSBach

Join date: 2009-10-10 Trade: Posts: 1044 Location: Australia
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Mon Apr 12, 2010 2:10 pm | |
| | Timbo wrote: | | A house sound would come down to the designer, if that designer changes over the years the sound character will probably change as the designer is different. | Or as with Mr Sugano of Koestu cartridge fame, as age diminishes upper treble hearing sensitivity, their designs attempt to compensate?
Last edited by JSBach on Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:46 am; edited 4 times in total (Reason for editing : HTML correction if you must know) |
|
 | |
woodstock

Join date: 2009-09-05 Trade: Posts: 512
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:41 pm | |
| That probably also explains why older gentlemen spend a considerable sum on highly priced audio while the younger generation don't. There is nothing like getting older, what age is it when your hearing starts deteriorating? |
|
 | |
Mark E Smith

Join date: 2009-10-07 Trade: Posts: 1852 Location: blighty
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:59 pm | |
| Is it nad ?
IQ 164 in case you take that seriously.........doh ! |
|
 | |
Joker

Join date: 2009-09-07 Trade: Posts: 1339
 | Subject: Re: guess my fav brand Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:00 pm | |
| The level of discussion on this board has sadly fallen to an all time low, i'm saddened to see such intellectual questions being made in to jokes, shame on you all, call yourselves audiophiles and you sink to suck low levels?
Have you no shame? |
|
 | |
|